4 2012cv00112 document 67 n d.
Reyelts v lon smith roofing and construction et al.
The problems for lon smith roofing started with the 2013 ruling in reyelts v.
And a 1 systems inc d b a lon smith roofing and construction.
Except for i think 1 176 neither the reyelts nor the insurance company paid anything to lon smith roofing for their roof lon smith is lucky in one respect.
2013 case opinion from the northern district of texas u s.
Federal district court.
And a 1 systems inc d b a lon smith roofing and construction.
Lon smith roofing and construction et al a home sustained hail damage during a may 2011 storm 8 soon thereafter a representative of lon smith roofing and construction personally.
The reyeltses like the keys filed suit against lon smith associates inc.
Lon smith roofing and construction et al 1 in reyelts the homeowners agreed to hire lon smith roofing and signed an.
Lon smith roofing and construction et al.
Cross et al no.
In the reyelts opinion these defendants are collectively referred to as the lon smith defendants while here we refer to them as the parties do as lsrc.
Will bring about a change in how roofing contractors market and.
The problems for lon smith roofing started with the 2013 ruling in reyelts v.
The reyeltses like the keys filed suit against lon smith associates inc.
In the reyelts opinion these defendants are collectively referred to as the lon smith defendants while here we refer to them as the parties do as lsrc.
Lon smith roofing and construction et al 1 in reyelts the homeowners agreed to hire lon smith roofing and signed an agreement on june 27 2011 which provided the following.
By signing this agreement homeowner the reyelts authorizes lon smith roofing and construction lsrc to pursue homeowners best interest for all repairs at a price agreeable to.
Lon smith roofing and construction et al a home sustained hail damage during a may 2011 storm 8 soon thereafter a representative of lon smith roofing and construction personally visited the homeowners offering their roofing services including an assessment of the hail damage and assistance with the insurance claim.
It remains to be seen if this new legislation and the recent decision in reyelts v.